play_arrow

keyboard_arrow_right

Listeners:

Top listeners:

skip_previous skip_next
00:00 00:00
playlist_play chevron_left
volume_up
Go to album
  • cover play_arrow

    LISTEN NOW: JafriQ Radio Live On Jafriq Radio

Entertainment

Nigeria: Bobrisky Enjoyed Special Privileges but No Evidence He Was Kept Outside Prison – Report

todayOctober 22, 2024 2

Background
share close

[ad_1]

She said the report contained findings regarding Bobrisky and allegations against some personnel at the Kuje Correctional Centre by Abdulrasheed Maina.

A report by the federal government’s investigative panel has stated that there was no evidence indicating that Idris Okuneye (Bobrisky) lived outside the Correctional Service Centre within his six months of imprisonment.

The report by the panel, set up by the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, to look into allegations of gross violation of standard operating procedures within the Nigerian Correctional Service (NCos), was submitted on Monday in Abuja.

Presenting the report to the minister, Magdalene Ajani, president of the panel and Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Interior, said it was the first phase.

She said the report contained findings regarding Bobrisky and allegations against some personnel at the Kuje Correctional Centre by Abdulrasheed Maina.

Mrs Ajani said the findings revealed that Bobrisky enjoyed several special privileges while in custody at the Medium-security and Maximum-security custodial centres, Kirikiri, Lagos.

“He had furnished single cells, humidifier, rugged floor and lots of visits by his family members and friends as he desired. Visits were also held inside the office of the officer-in-charge of the custodial centre.

“He also enjoyed the privileges of self-feeding, designated inmate to run errands for him, access to fridge and television, and possibly access to his phone,” she said.

She, however, underscored the need to further investigate, if the privileges were financially induced and based on corrupt practices by correctional officers.

Mrs Ajani noted that the peculiarities and physical appearances of the responder probably led to the special treatment he received from the correctional officers.

According to her, findings revealed that the decision to transfer Bobrisky from the Ikoyi custodial centre to the Medium maximum centre was made by Ben Freeman, the then controller of the NCos Lagos Command.

“The state controller, however, has the power by law to transfer inmates within the same state.

“Proper documentation was, however, not made prior to his transfers but the documents were later provided and backdated.

“This is in violation of Section 168 and 169 of the NCoS service standing order, and the transfer of Bobrisky being a first offender violates section 16 4(a) (b) of the Ncos Act, 2019,” she added.

The president of the panel said that the committee proposed that in future, provisions should be made available for peculiarities such as Bobrisky’s case.

According to her, steps should be taken to avoid obvious discriminatory practices in relation to the socio-economic levels and other statuses of inmates.

In the same vein, the panel report indicated that it was true that a senior officer collected funds from convict Abdulrasheed Maina’s son.

According to her, the panel, upon interrogation of the officer, discovered that money was paid into his personal account.

“The officer claimed that the money paid into his personal account was for the purpose of catering for Maina’s welfare and health.

“He acted unethically and brought himself and the service to great disrepute by requesting and receiving money from Maina’s son.

“The panel is of the view that, even if the transfers were made with Maina’s approval, it is still a violation, as the officer’s conduct was not consistent with institutional regulations,” she said.

The panel therefore recommended that all correctional service personnel should “be re-trained and be persons of integrity and character.”

The panel also recommended that personnel without previous direct heading of a custodial centre should not be deployed to head big and sensitive custodial centres.